Kuhn once engaged in reversion war with a lawyer who disagreed, but that lawyer never answered Kuhn’s requests for case law that argues THIS IS INHERENTLY MORE CONSPICUOUS T h a n t h i s i s. Kuhn, has often suggested the aesthetically preferable compromise of a s p e c i f i c a l l y d e s i g n e d s m a l l c a p s” f o n t, s u c h a s t h i s o n e, a s a n a l t e r n a t i v e t o WRITING IN ALL CAPS IN THE DEFAULT FONT (LIKE THIS), since the latter adds more ugliness than conspicuousness.
That said, there is admittedly some authority under USA law suggesting that conspicuousness can be established by capitalization and is absent when a disclaimer has the same typeface as the terms surrounding it (see Stevenson v. There is apparently general acceptance that a l l c a p sis the preferred way to make something conspicuous, and that has over decades worked its way into the voodoo tradition of warranty disclaimer writing. The, which most of the USA’s states and commonwealths have adopted as their local law, allows disclaimers of warranty, provided that the disclaimer is “conspicuous”. 8.3 GPLv2 §11: No Warranty Most warranty disclaimer language shouts at you.
Namely, the copyright holder of a particular software program has the prerogative to grant alternative agreements under separate copyright licenses. (Chapter discusses more about the various versions of GPL.) 8.2 GPLv2 §10: Relicensing Permitted GPLv2 §10 reminds the licensee of what is already implied by the nature of copyright law.
0 kommentar(er)
